Evidence

Evidence
Evidence and submissions to the Review will be published on this page.

The Review will publish all submissions and evidence by the conclusion of the Review, unless there are legal difficulties to prevent publication, or unless they are abusive or potentially defamatory.

If you have made a submission, it will be possible for the public to see that you or your organisation have done so – though the Review will not publish private postal or email addresses, or telephone contact details. The team will publish submissions in full accordance with the Data Protection Act.

Publication of submissions
The Review reserves the right to withhold publication of submissions if they are abusive, potentially defamatory or there are other legal difficulties which prevent publication. In these cases, the Review will seek permission for us to publish contact details for the submission’s authors, so that interested parties may contact them directly.

Publication of correspondence or submissions by the Review are not an endorsement of the views expressed by the author(s).

David Holland's submission:
Mr Holland has made a submission to the Review which, like every other submission, has been read and noted in full. However, on legal advice we cannot publish the submission in its current form. Mr Holland subsequently submitted a letter response in lieu of his submission. This also cannot be published in its current form. The Review has offered to publish a redacted version of the letter response and publish Mr Holland's contact details for those who wish to obtain a copy of his submission directly from him. However, Mr Holland has not consented to this.

External websites
Some of the submissions include website details and/or hyperlinks to websites or blogs. The Review is not responsible for the content of external websites referred to in any submission. The Review is not responsible for maintaining these websites, and they can be modified or updated without the Review’s knowledge or agreement.

Publication of submissions containing website details and/or links to websites or blogs should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or blog, its content or the site’s owners.

Copyrighted materials
Some submissions include materials which are held under copyright by third parties (e.g. excerpts from journal articles or books, or materials written or published by a third party). Since the Review does not have the right to reproduce copyrighted materials, the Review has removed these materials and provided details about where they can be found and/or purchased.

Re: Written Evidence – UEA  ‘A list of a all FOI requests received relating to the Climatic Research Unit since 2005’
Readers should note the addition of the 08-31 FOI request which was previously omitted due to an administrative error. The revision does not affect the conclusions or recommendations of the final report.

Sort by Date | Type | Number | Author

Date: 09/04/10
Type: Written evidence
Number: 0142
Author: Response to Summary of salient points and additional requested information
Link: click to open

Date: 09/04/10
Type: Written evidence
Number: 0123
Author: Issues and questions to be examined with Professor Jones and Briffa at 9 April meeting
Link: click to open

Date: 08/04/10
Type: Oral evidence
Number: 0129
Author: Interview with Cecile Piper conducted by Muir Russell & David Eyton
Link: click to open

Date: 08/04/10
Type: Written submission
Number: 0046
Author: D R G Andrews
Link: click to open

Date: 08/04/10
Type: Written submission
Number: 0047
Author: Professor Joshua B. Halpern
Link: click to open

Date: 08/04/10
Type: Written evidence
Number: 0124
Author: Muir Russell correspondence with Lord Oxbourgh
Link: click to open

Date: 31/03/10
Type: Written evidence
Number: 0118
Author: Response from Rob Bell to questions from David Eyton on CRU financial controls
Link: click to open

Date: 30/03/10
Type: Oral evidence
Number: 0136
Author: Notes of Sir Muir Russell & Prof. Jim Norton's interview with David Palmer (Information Policy & Compliance Manager) and Jonathan Colam-French (Director Information Systems Department)
Link: click to open

Date: 30/03/10
Type: Oral evidence
Number: 0137
Author: Notes of Sir Muir Russell & Prof. Jim Norton's interviews with Michael McGarvie Science Faculty FoIA contact
Link: click to open

Date: 29/03/10
Type: Written evidence
Number: 0119
Author: Response from Mike Salmon to questions from Jim Norton on CRU server
Link: click to open

 

 

 

[First Page] [Prev] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [Next] [Last Page]

The Review shall not be liable for any of the following losses or damage (whether such damage or losses were foreseen, foreseeable, known or otherwise): (a) loss of data; (b) loss of revenue or anticipated profits; (c) loss of business; (d) loss of opportunity; (e) loss of goodwill or injury to reputation; (f) losses suffered by third parties; or (g) any indirect, consequential, special or exemplary damages arising from the use of www.cce-review.org regardless of the form of action.

back to top

Latest
News

7 July 2010 
REPORT PUBLISHED...more

5 July 2010 
Publication date set for 13:00 on the 7 July...more

16 April 2010 
Second tranche of submissions published...more

Review
Update