Evidence and submissions to the Review will be published on this page.

The Review will publish all submissions and evidence by the conclusion of the Review, unless there are legal difficulties to prevent publication, or unless they are abusive or potentially defamatory.

If you have made a submission, it will be possible for the public to see that you or your organisation have done so – though the Review will not publish private postal or email addresses, or telephone contact details. The team will publish submissions in full accordance with the Data Protection Act.

Publication of submissions
The Review reserves the right to withhold publication of submissions if they are abusive, potentially defamatory or there are other legal difficulties which prevent publication. In these cases, the Review will seek permission for us to publish contact details for the submission’s authors, so that interested parties may contact them directly.

Publication of correspondence or submissions by the Review are not an endorsement of the views expressed by the author(s).

David Holland's submission:
Mr Holland has made a submission to the Review which, like every other submission, has been read and noted in full. However, on legal advice we cannot publish the submission in its current form. Mr Holland subsequently submitted a letter response in lieu of his submission. This also cannot be published in its current form. The Review has offered to publish a redacted version of the letter response and publish Mr Holland's contact details for those who wish to obtain a copy of his submission directly from him. However, Mr Holland has not consented to this.

External websites
Some of the submissions include website details and/or hyperlinks to websites or blogs. The Review is not responsible for the content of external websites referred to in any submission. The Review is not responsible for maintaining these websites, and they can be modified or updated without the Review’s knowledge or agreement.

Publication of submissions containing website details and/or links to websites or blogs should not be understood to be an endorsement of that website or blog, its content or the site’s owners.

Copyrighted materials
Some submissions include materials which are held under copyright by third parties (e.g. excerpts from journal articles or books, or materials written or published by a third party). Since the Review does not have the right to reproduce copyrighted materials, the Review has removed these materials and provided details about where they can be found and/or purchased.

Re: Written Evidence – UEA  ‘A list of a all FOI requests received relating to the Climatic Research Unit since 2005’
Readers should note the addition of the 08-31 FOI request which was previously omitted due to an administrative error. The revision does not affect the conclusions or recommendations of the final report.

Sort by Date | Type | Number | Author

Date: 19/05/10
Type: Written evidence
Number: 0143
Author: Briffa, Information re: Wahl and Ammann (2007, Climatic Change) and its usage in the IPCC AR4
Link: click to open

Date: 17/05/10
Type: Written evidence
Number: 0139
Author: Professor Peter Sommer, UEA CRU Review, Initial Report and commentary on email examination
Link: click to open

Date: 06/05/10
Type: Written evidence
Number: 0120
Author: Responses from Keith Briffa and Timothy Osborn to questions from Geoffrey Boulton on Review membership
Link: click to open

Date: 03/05/10
Type: Written evidence
Number: 0132
Author: Response (dated 7.5.10) from Prof Phil Jones to additional questions from Prof Geoffrey
Link: click to open

Date: 21/04/10
Type: Written evidence
Number: 0121
Author: Response from Mick Gorrill to questions from Jim Norton on FOI and EIR requests
Link: click to open

Date: 20/04/10
Type: Written evidence
Number: 0134
Author: UEA CRU Responses to Questions 200410
Link: click to open

Date: 15/04/10
Type: Written evidence
Number: 0133
Author: Response dated 200410 from Prof Phil Jones to questions from Prof Geoffrey Boulton
Link: click to open

Date: 13/04/10
Type: Written submission
Number: 0106
Author: Dr McKitrick
Link: click to open

Date: 12/04/10
Type: Written evidence
Number: 0152
Author: Response from Iain Reeman to Prof. Jim Norton's questions on CRU server
Link: click to open

Date: 09/04/10
Type: Written evidence
Number: 0123
Author: Issues and questions to be examined with Professor Jones and Briffa at 9 April meeting
Link: click to open




[First Page] [Prev] 1 2 3 4 5 6 7 8 9 10 11 12 13 14 15 16 [Next] [Last Page]

The Review shall not be liable for any of the following losses or damage (whether such damage or losses were foreseen, foreseeable, known or otherwise): (a) loss of data; (b) loss of revenue or anticipated profits; (c) loss of business; (d) loss of opportunity; (e) loss of goodwill or injury to reputation; (f) losses suffered by third parties; or (g) any indirect, consequential, special or exemplary damages arising from the use of www.cce-review.org regardless of the form of action.

back to top


7 July 2010 

5 July 2010 
Publication date set for 13:00 on the 7 July...more

16 April 2010 
Second tranche of submissions published...more